Pages

Showing posts with label Zoroastrianism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zoroastrianism. Show all posts

Canadian Historical Association (CHA) Newsletter August 2026

 01 August 2026

Canadian Historical Association (CHA)

Newsletter, August 2026, Issue 7.4

NEWS

Canadian Historical Association, Newsletter, August 2026, Issue 7.4, Page 05
 https://cha-shc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/HC-RH-7.4.pdf or
https://cha-shc.ca/publications/historians-corner-the-chas-digital-newsletter/

Canadian Historical Association (CHA) Newsletter, August 2026, N 7.4 mentions that Dr Mahir Khalifa-zadeh has published an article entitled “Zoroastrianism and its Prophet Zoroaster: Where Zoroaster Communed with God?”, International Journal of Innovative Studies in Humanities and Social Studies, USA, 2026, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71123/3067-7319.020301



PDF available at:

Zoroastrianism and its Prophet: Is Azerbaijan Where Zoroaster Communed with God?

 by Mahir Khalifa-zadeh*

Created:  30 April 2026

Updated: 25 August, 2026

Posted and expanded from:

Khalifa-zadeh M., "Zoroastrianism and its Prophet Zoroaster: Where Zoroaster Communed with God?", International Journal of Innovative Studies in Humanities and Social Studies, USA, 2026, Vol 2, Issue 3, 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71123/3067-7319.020301 

PDF: https://www.academia.edu/167653259/ZOROASTRIANISM_AND_ITS_PROPHET_IS_AZERBAIJAN_WHERE_ZOROASTER_COMMUNICATED_WITH_GOD

Fig 1. Mithraic depiction of Zoroaster found in Parthian city of Dura Europos, Syria (300 BC)

Zoroastrianism is one of the world's oldest religions. Zoroastrianism left a footprint in Iran many centuries before the arrival of Christianity (later established as the Church of the East/ Church of Persia) and Islam in this country. The Great Achaemenid Kings (r. 550–330 BC), highly likely, were followers of Zoroastrianism (now commonly termed as "Mazdaism" for the Achaemenid period) and supported its strengthening in their Empire. In the meantime, there are some views that Cyrus the Great (r. 580 - 529 BC) was already Zoroastrian, unifying Medians and Persians under his rule.

However, only in the Sasanian period did Zoroastrianism become the official religion in Iran (Ērānšahr, at the time). The Sasanian King Shāpūr I (r. 239-270 CE), son of the Sasanian Empire founder Ardaxšīr I Bābakān (r. 180–242 CE), proclaimed Zoroastrianism as the empire's official religion.

The essence of Zoroastrianism is that human beings must be on the truth (Avestan: Aṣ̌a) side, helping to support order, peace, righteousness and justice that the principal God Ahura Mazdā (Avestan: Ahuramazda, Median: Ahura Mazdaka, Pahlavi: Hormizd) tries to maintain, while battling with the destructive spirit or evil Angra Manyu (Avestan: Aŋra Mainiiu, Pahlavi: Ahreman). Zoroastrianism teaches that Ahura Mazdā is the highest object of adoration, the true Creator, Preserver, and Governor of the universe. From him all good comes to man. The Bisitun Inscription designates Ahura Mazdā as "the god of the Aryans".

There is a popular misinterpretation that Zoroastrians worshiped fire. The fire (Avestan: Ātarš, later Zoroastrian holy fire: Ātaš/ Ātar, Parthian/ Pahlavi: Ādurwas a “tool” or “messenger” for communicating with Ahura Mazdā, the creator and guardian of justice and a friend of the just man. Zoroastrian Magi (Avestan: Maga, Median/Old Persian: Magu, Middle Persian/ Pahlavi: maguš), or priests acted as a Mediator between the worshiper and the divinity. The Magi/ Magus [1], as Igor Diakonoff believed, were a specially trained tribe or caste of the Medes (Pahlavi: Mād/a, Greek: Medians) and played a critical role in Zoroastrian society. The Magian Church held significant power and influence that the Shah could not ignore. 

Interestingly, Diakonoff argued that the Medes, as an Aryan tribe, were the first to adopt Zoroastrianism, and that the first Achaemenids were the next. George Rawlinson believed that it was in Media that the Magies were first found acting in the capacity of Aryan priests, thrusting into the background the old Aryan belief. The Medes never apostatized from the worship to Ahura Mazdā or surrendered their Dualistic belief. 

The origin and development of Zoroastrianism associate with the Prophet (Avestan: paygambar) Zoroaster (Avestan: Zaraθuštra, Greek, Ζωροάστρης/ Zōroastrēs, Pahlavi: zltw(h)št Zar(a)du(x)št). He, as Philippe Kreyenbroek believes, authored the Gāthās (Hymns) [2] and rejected the cult of the old Aryan group of gods known as daevas (Avestan: daēuua) in favor to One True God - Ahura Mazdā. 

Zoroaster in Avestan (language of Zoroastrians' Avesta, a collection of the sacred texts, likely have been composed in Achaemenid times by about 400 BC) means the owner of yellow or golden (zarat) camels (uštra). However, whether name Zoroaster was the Prophet's own or it was a title remains uncertain and for the lack of evidence has never been satisfactorily explained.

There is a diversity of opinion with reference to Zoroaster's time. The classical tradition, based on Xanthos of Lydia (470 BC, first Greek writer who mentioned Zoroaster), Aristotle (350 BC), Eudoxus of Cnidus (368 BC), and Plutarch (50-120 CE)  statements, places Zoroaster 5000 years before the Trojan war, or 6000 years before Xerxes' (r. 518-465 BC) crossing the Hellespont.

Indeed, it is of great interest for scholars to identify when and where Zoroaster was born and where he came to preach. His name origin, life, and preaching continue to be a subject of intensive debates among the historians.

There are wide discussions among modern scholars about Zoroaster's date, fueling by the existing discrepancy in the classical statements. Some scholars, such as Oktor Skjaervo, believe that Zoroaster lived 1700-1200 years before Christ. Karl Geldner argues that if the Gāthās (Avesta's earliest part) reach back to the lifetime of Zoroaster, so the Prophet lived around 1400 BC.  However, others, like Gherardo Gnoli, referring to Greek sources, suppose that he flourished around 300-500 years before Alexander of Macedon. Williams Jackson assigned Zoroaster's birth about 300 years before 330 BC, the date of the fall of the Achaemenid empire through Alexander's conquest or around 630 BC. 

Interestingly, Middle Persian Zoroastrian text of Ardā-i Wīrāz nāmag (Book of the Righteous Wīrāz) [3] mentions that at the end of 300 years of righteous Zaratosht's religion the "foul Evil Spirit tries to make men doubtful in regard to this religion, instigated the accursed Alexander... so that he came to the country of Iran with severe cruelty and devastation, he also slew the ruler of Iran, and destroyed the metropolis and empire and made them desolate". Thus, the Magians count around 300 years (more exactly 258 years) between their Prophet Zoroaster and Alexander. They also state that Zoroaster taught 35 years and died at the age of seventy seven.

Next, regarding Zoroaster’s birthplace, some scholars, citing classical Greek sources, identify him as a Bactrian, mentioning him as Zoroaster the Magian, king of Bactria. However, others argue that he was from Balkh, which is now in Afghanistan. 

However, there are certain sources and accounts, based on which the scholars believe that Zoroaster probably was a native of Azerbaijan and first appeared in western Iran, either in Atropatene [5] (Greek: Ἀτροπατηνή, Old Persian: Ātūr-pātakān, Pahlavi: Ādurbādagān) or in Media (Assyrian: Mādāya, Median/ Old PersianMāda'a).

Indeed, several classical sources name Zoroaster as a Mede (Median) and member of the great Median house of Spitāma (Pahlavi: zartušt ē spitāmān), placing him in Ādarbījān or Media-Atropatene. The house of Spitāma was powerful and rich and the last Median King Astyīgās' daughter Amytis had first married with Spitamas and later Cyrus the Great.

Media's Urmiah (Avestan: Čēčast), as several sources mention, probably was a native place of Zoroaster. Moses of Chorene (431 CE) mentions Zoroaster as “a Magian, the sovereign of the Medes”, who seized Nineveh, placing him as a contemporary of Semiramis (r. 811-806 BC), queen-regent of the Assyrian empire.

The Arabic Chronicon of Bar Ebhraya (also known as Tārīkh Mukhtaṣar al-Duwal or "History of the Dynasties") mentions the following: "In those days (of Cambyses) came Zaradosht chief of the Magian sect, by birth of Ādarbījān...". [Here, Cambyses is likely Cyrus the Great's father, rather than his son]. 

The Bundahishn (Middle Persian/ Pahlavi: Bun-dahišn(īh), "Primal Creation", a Pahlavi compilation based on Zoroastrian scriptures) mentions that Zoroaster's father's house stood near the river Darja/Darej (Pahlavi: Dāraja) that flows from Mount Sabalan/ Savalan in Ādarbījān (Atropatene) into the Aras (classical Araxes) river (present-day Azerbaijan).

The Arabic writer Kazwini associates Zoroaster with the ancient city of Shīz or Ganzaka (Greek: Γάζακα), capital of Atropatene. Rawlinson and Minorsky identify Shīz with modern Takht-e Soleiman in Azerbaijan (Iran), where are the ruins of Ādur Gušnasp fire (now Azargoshnasp), one of the three Great Fires of ancient Iran. 

Interestingly, Zoroastrian text of Ardā-i Wīrāz nāmag as well as Arabic historians Tabari and Masudi mention that Alexander of Macedon burnt the 12,000 oxhides of the original Avesta, which was written in golden lettering. It was kept in the Fortress (House) of Archives (Daz-i Napisht, Pahlavi: diz ī nibištat the city of Istakhr in Pārs or in the library of Ganj-i Shapigan (Pahlavi: ganj ī šāhīgān/ ganj ī xwadāyānThe Royal Treasure) in Persepolis. According to Parsi tradition, King Vištāsp (first ruler, who followed Zoroaster's teaching) ordered master copies of the sacred text or twenty-one Nasks or volumes of the Avesta written by Zoroaster to be deposit in the royal libraries of Daz-i Napisht and/or Ganj-i Shapigan, which were burnt and destroyed by the Macedonians. 

Thus, Ardā-i Wīrāz nāmag says: "Alexander ... came to Iran... and burnt... the whole of the Avesta and the Zand as written in liquid gold on prepared cowhides . . . and deposited in Staxr Pābagān" (Istakhr in Pārs).

In the meantime, there are certain sources, indicating that another master copy of the Holy Avesta, copied on calf skins was kept in the fire temple of Ādur Gušnasp in Shīz. Herzfeld believes that Shīz' copy was carried to Egypt and translated into Greek (in the library of Alexandria). Aturpāt (Atropates), Achaemenid King Darius III's general and satrap of Media and later of Media-Atropatene, had been able to secure the holy fire of Ādur Gušnasp not to be ransacked by the Macedonians.

The Sasanian King Šāpūr I (r. 239-270) granted a rank of “cathedral” to the Ādur Gušnasp fire and ordered to collect Avesta's all surviving scripturesHis powerful mobedān mobed (priest of priests) or supreme Magi Kirdīr was affiliated with the fire-temple of Ādur Gušnasp. Later, during the King Šāpūr II's reign (r. 309-370), the Avesta was canonized in Avestan script written by the mobedān mobed Ādurbād-ī Mahrspandān, who introduced the Prophet's name writing as zltw(h)št Zar(a)du(x)št and ceased all oral tradition. Influenceable Ādurbād-ī Mahrspandān (“Ādurbād, son of Mahraspand”) was also affiliated with Ādur Gušnasp in Azerbaijan. Herzfeld comments that the magi of Ādharbāijān belonging to the Atropanenian line were more powerful and influenceable than the Persian.  

Fig 2. Mt Savalan/ Sebīlān, Ardabil county, Azerbaijan, Iran

Next, the passage from Kazwini (quoted from Rawlinson) reads: "In Shiz is the fire- temple of Azerekhsh [Pahlavi: Ādur Gušnasp/ Ādhar Gušnasp], the most celebrated of the Pyraea of the Magi; in the days of the fire-worship, the kings always came on foot, upon pilgrimage. The temple of Azerekhsh is ascribed to Zeratusht, the founder of the Magian religion, who went, it is said, from Shiz to the mountain of Sebīlān and, after remaining there some time in retirement, returned with the Zend-Avesta, which, although written in the old Persian language, could not be understood without a commentary. After this, he declared himself to be a prophet."

According to Williams Jackson, speaking on Shīz in Ādarbaijān, Kazwini continued: "Zarādusht, the prophet of the Magians, takes his origin from here (i.e., Ādarbaijān). It is said that he came from Shīz. He went to the mountain Sabalān, separated from men."

Indeed, there is an account indicating that Zoroaster began to preach on the Mt. Sabalan/ Savalan (Pahlavi: Sebīlān, 4811 m). The mount is in the modern Ardabil county of Azerbaijan in Iran. The people of Azerbaijan call Mt. Soltan Savalan, describing it as a holy mountain. 

Remarkably, Jackson writes that the Avesta mentions a hill by the river Darja where Zoroaster communed with Ahura Mazdā. He argues that the hill (zbarah) or mountain (gairi) is the Mount Sebīlān. According to him, the Avesta's Darja River is probably the modern Darya (?) river, which flows from Mt. Sebīlān into the Aras river (Araxes).

Interestingly, the Vidēvdāt (Sasanian collection of Avesta's scriptures) mentions 16 perfect lands (asah) and countries (šōiθra), which Ahura Mazdā created for His people. Avestan Geography identifies Avesta's Iran Vej (Avestan: Ayriianəm Vaēǰah, Pahlavi: Ērān-wēz, “the area of the Aryans”), the stem-land of the Aryan race, with Atropatene [Azerbaijan]. According to Vidēvdāt, Ērān-wēz or Iran Vej was the first-best country created by Ahura Mazdā for the Aryan people. Some scholars indicate that the Aryan migration occurred descending downwards through the Caucasus towards the hospital south. 

Fig 3. Map of the sacred lands created by Ahura Mazdā for His people as it described in Vendidāt (Fargard 1) 
available at: https://hansavedas.org/2026/02/23/indo-iranian-roots-in-south-caucasus/

Williams Jackson writes that the Bundahish (29.12) directly connects Iran Vej (the holy land of Zoroastrianism where Zarathushtra was born and founded his religion there) with Atropatene [4]: "Aīrān Vej pavan kōst-ī Ātūr-pātakān" that rendered by Edward West (first translator of Bundahishn) as the following: "Eranvej is in the direction of Ataro-patakan (Azerbaijan)." 

However, James Darmesteter (first translator of the Zend-Avesta identifies the province Airyanem Vaeja (Iran Vej), or Eranwej, with Arran (nowadays known as Karabagh, present-day Azerbaijan). He translates the passage from Avesta Vendidāt/Vidēvdād (Fargard 1) as follows: “Ahura Mazda spake Zarathushtra, saying: The first of the good lands and countries which I, Ahura Mazda, created, was the Airyana Vaeja, by the Vanguhi Daitya.” 

According to the Bundahishn, as Darmesteter mentions, Airyanem Vaeja or Iran-Vej is "bordering upon Adarbajan" that now is Azerbaijan that borders with the Caspian Sea [5] (Avestan: Vourukaša, Pahlavi: Frākhvkard, "having wide shores"on the east and by Media proper on the south, and by Arran on the north. He highlights that the belonging to Arran, the river of Vanguhi Daitya (Avestan: Vaŋuhī Dāityā, the “good Dāityā” [6]) "must be the modern Aras (classical Araxes) river." For several reasons, he excludes Media and suits Arran to be Iran-Vej as the original seat of the Aryans. It is interesting to note, that the Zend-Avesta (Yasht 5.104) mentions Vanguhi Daitya as a river where Zoroaster offered a sacrifice to the goddess of the waters Anāhitā to convert Vīštāspa, first ruler who accepted Zoroaster's teaching.

Fig 4. Zoroastrians (locals, Iranians and Parsis) pray in Ateshgah Fire Temple, Baku, Azerbaijan

Fig 5. Ateshgah Fire Temple, Baku, Azerbaijan

Truly, the region of Arran (Pahlavi: Ārān), also known as the Caucasian Albanian, is the present-day Azerbaijan, bordering with the Caspian Sea on the east and Iranian Azerbaijan (classical Media-Atropatena) on the south. 

As someone can mention, Zoroastrian tradition identifies Ayriianəm Vaēǰah with Azerbaijan. The Pahlavi and Sasanian books introduce Airyanem Vaeja around Azerbaijan. And, historians like James Darmesteter and Ernst Herzfeld believed that Airyanem Vaeja's location is Azerbaijan and around the Caucasus. Intriguingly, in the Avesta, the Ranhā/ Rasā river associates with Ayriianəm Vaēǰah that allows the modern Zoroastrian Parsis' scholars to assume that it might mean the Aras river.

The Bundahishn (20.32) directly mentions that the river Darja/ Darej, near which stood the house of Zoroaster's father, Pourušaspa Spitāma, had been in Iran Vej. Hezfeld provides the following passage from the Bundahishn: "Dāraǰa rōt pat ērānvēž kē.š mān ē parušasp pitar e zartušt pa bār būt", rendering it as the follow: "Daraja is a river in Ērānvēž, on the bank of which stood the palace of Purušasp, father of Zoroaster". The Bundahishn (24.15) states: "The Daraja river is the chief of exalted rivers, for the dwelling of the father of Zartosht was on its banks, and Zartosht was born there."

In the meantime, Jackson notes that the Bundahishn likewise alludes to Zoroaster's first offering worship in Iran Vej. He provides Darmesteter's translation of the passage from the Avesta: "Zoroaster communed with Ahura Mazda on the high bank of the Darej, sitting (?) before the good Ahura Mazda... ". Herzfeld mentions that river was located "in Ērānvēž" and Zoroaster (Yasht 5,104) prayed "at the mouth of the Vahvī [good] Dātiyā of the Aryans." The Bundahishn accounts that Zoroaster's age was 30 when he beheld the first vision of Ohrmazd (Ahura Mazdā). 

Next, Jackson states that "With regard to localizations, there is good ground for believing that Airan Vej (Avestan: Ayriianəm Vaāēǰah) is to be identified in part at least with Ādarbaijān, and that the ancient river Dāraja of the Avesta is identical with the modern Daryai. The Daryai Rūd (river) flows from Mt. Savalān (Sebīlān), in Ādarbaijān, northward into the Aras River (Araxes)."

Regarding Zoroaster's native place and his parents, Jackson comments: "Oriental tradition seems to be fairly correct in assigning, as his native land, the district of Atropatene or Ādarbaijān, to the west of Media, or even more precisely the neighborhood about Lake Urumiah. There is ground, furthermore, for believing in the tradition which says that his father Pourušaspa ["with grey horses"] was a native of Ādarbaijān, - a region of naphtha wells and oil fountains, - and that Zoroaster's mother Dugdōvā ["who has milked cows"] was from the Median city of Ragha (Rai)." 

He continues: "In the latter region probably Zoroaster was born and seems to have spent there the first part of his life, probably by the river Darja. It was there his religious meditations began. That account for his name being associated with all this territory Urmiah, Shīz, Mount Sebīlān."

Finally, Jackson concludes: "There is a great reason to believe that if, as seems most likely, Zoroaster was born in Atropatene, he was drawn toward the important city of Ragha, somewhat perhaps as Christ went to Jerusalem". Jackson considered Ragha (Ragā) of Media as "Zāraθuštriš "Papal See."

In summing up, Azerbaijan's Mount Savalan is one of the sacred places in Zoroastrianism where, according to some significant sources, Prophet Zoroaster received a divine revelation. The mount may be the Avestan "Mount of the Holy Communicants." Nietzsche mentions that Prophet Zoroaster ascended Mount Savalan. 

Later, in the Sasanian period, Ādurbādagān [Azerbaijan] became a center of Zoroastrian propaganda and religious "core" province of the Sasanian empire, projecting its influence, name and military functions on Arran (Caucasian Albania, present-day Azerbaijan) up to the Darband fortress on the Caspian shores that resulted, as we believe, that the name Azerbaijan became common in use on the both south and north banks of the Aras (Araxes) river.

* Khalifa-zadeh M., Research Professor, Ph.D, Canadian Historical Association, Ottawa, Canada

Notices

[1] There was another class of fire priest or title of Magi/ Magus (Parthian: āturšpat, fire - ātur, "fire master"). The Magi had a special sect called "Fire Kindlers" (Pyraithoi/ "fire igniters"). 

[2] The oldest part of Avesta (Gathas or Songs/ Hymns) roots deep to the time of Medes (Medians) and reflects the form of the Median religion. 

[3] The book probably was written in 3rd century, during the time of the first Sasanian king Ardaxšīr I Babakan. 

[4] Atropatene perhaps was a place where legendary hero Feridun (Avestan: ΘraētaonaPahlavi: Frēdōnwas born and ruled up to 500 years. According to both Zoroastrian and Parsi tradition, Feridun had second son with name of Tur, who was a brave warrior. He ruled the land in the East or Turān/ Turkistan (The land of Tur) that was Anērān (not-Iran).

[5] According to Zoroastrian myth, the Holy Fire (Ātar/Ātur) fought with Dragon-Three Head Monster (Avestan: Aži Dahāka) for the Divine Glory in Ahura Mazdā 's created ocean of Vourukaša, which some scholars identify with the Caspian Sea. 

[6] River Vaŋuhī Dāityā, the “good Dāityā” or River of the Good Law/Religion.


References:

A.V. Williams Jackson, Where Was Zoroaster's Native Place?, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol 15, 1893, pp. 221-232, https://doi.org/10.2307/592356

A.V. Williams Jackson, On the Date of Zoroaster, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol 17, 1896, pp. 1-22, https://doi.org/10.2307/592499

A.V. Williams Jackson, Zoroaster the Prophet of Ancient Iran, London 1899, 352, available at: https://archive.org/details/cu31924022982502/page/n5/mode/2up

Bundahishn ("Creation") or knowledge of Zand, Trans: E.W.West, from Sacred Books of the East, volume 5, Oxford University Press, 1897, Digitized and converted by Joseph H. Peterson, 1997, 59, Avesta.org publishing, Last updated Feb 24, 2022 available at: https://www.avesta.org/mp/bundahis.pdf or online https://www.avesta.org/pahlavi/bund29.html

The Book of Arda Viraf, Trans: Martin Haug, University of Munich, 1917, 315, Avesta.org publishing, available at: https://www.avesta.org/mp/viraf.html

Gignoux Philippe, Ardā-i Wīrāz nāmag, Encyclopedia Iranica, 1986, Vol II Fasc. 4, 356-357, https://doi.org/10.1163/2330-4804_EIRO_COM_5631

Vendidad (Vidēvdād) or Laws against the Demons, Avesta - The Sacred Books of Zoroastrianism, Book 3, Trans: James Darmesteter (From Sacred Books of the East), Ed: Joseph H. Peterson, American Edition, 1898, 192, Avesta.org publishing, 1995, available at: https://www.avesta.org/vendidad/vd_eng.pdf

AVESTA: VENDIDAD (English): Fargard 1, digital edition, prepared by Joseph H. Peterson, 1995, available at: https://www.avesta.org/vendidad/vd1sbe.htm

The Zend Avesta, Part II (SBE23)V. ÂBÂN YAST, Trans: James Darmesteter, available at: https://sacred-texts.com/zor/sbe23/sbe2310.htm

Roots Hount, Avestan Geography, available at: https://rootshunt.com/angirasgautam/sumeriancivilizationinfulenceonhinduism/assyria/whowereasurs/avestangeography/avestangeography.htm

Gherardo Gnoli, Avestan Geography, Encyclopedia Iranica, 2011, Vol. III, Fasc. 1, pp. 44-47, available at: https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/avestan-geography

Gherardo Gnoli, "DĀITYĀ, VAŊHVĪ", Encyclopedia Iranica, 1993, available at:  https://doi.org/10.1163/2330-4804_EIRO_COM_7969

Philippe Kroyenbriek, "The Developing Zoroastrian World and Orality", In: The Zoroastrian World, Ed: Jenny Rose, Albert de Jong, Sarah Steward, Routledge, 2026, 614.

Mary Boyce, "Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices", Routledge, 1979, 252.

Ernst Herzfeld, "Zoroaster and His World", Vol-1 and 2, Princeton University Press, 1947.

John W. Waterhouse, "Zoroastrianism", London, The Epworth Press, 1934, p. 136, modern edition 2006, The Book Tree, p.134.

Diakonov I. "Istoriya Midii ot drevneĭshikh vremen do kontsa 4 v. do n.e." (History of Media from ancient time till the end of 4th century), Moscow & Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1956, 453.

Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and No One, Penguin Classics, 1961, 352.

Oktor Skjaervø, "The Avesta as source for the early history of the Iranians," In: The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia, Ed: George Erdosy, Gruyter, 1995, 155-176, available at: https://www.academia.edu/28622991/_The_Avesta_as_Source_for_the_Early_History_of_the_Iranians_pdf

Mattew P. Canepa, "Zoroastrianism in Anatolia and the Caucasus", In: Zoroastrian Worlds, Ed: Jenney Rose, Albert de Jong, Sara Steward, Routledge, 2026, 293- 308. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168904

Lucinda Dirven, "Zoroastrianism in the Religious Context of the Arsacid Empire,"  In: Zoroastrian Worlds, Ed: Jenney Rose, Albert de Jong, Sara Steward, Routledge, 2026, 167-177.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168904

Muhammad Dandamayev, "MAGI", Encyclopedia Iranica, 2000, https://doi.org/10.1163/2330-4804_EIRO_COM_11099

Muhammad Dandamayev,  "Cyrus II the Great", Encyclopedia Iranica, 2013, Vol. VI, Fasc. 5, pp. 516-521, available at:  https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cyrus-iii/

Ardashir, "Darius the Great Zoroastrian versus Cyrus the Emperor", available at: https://authenticgathazoroastrianism.org/2015/04/06/darius-the-great-zoroastrian-and-cyrus-the-emperor/

Vladimir Minorsky, "Caucasia IV", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1953;15 (3): 504-529.

Vedveer Arya, "Indo-Iranian Roots in South Caucasus", available at: https://hansavedas.org/2026/02/23/indo-iranian-roots-in-south-caucasus/

Alberto Cantera, "Fire, the Greatest God (ātarš ... mazišta yazata): The Cult of the “Eternal” Fire in the Rituals in Avestan", Indo-Iranian Journal, 2019, Vol 62, #1, pp 19-61, https://doi.org/10.1163/15728536-06201004

"AVESTA", available at: http://www.zoroaster.com/avesta/avesta.htm

Farrokh Jal Vajifdar, "Avestan Geography: Some Topographical Aspects", available at: https://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions/iranian/Zarathushtrian/avestan_geography.htm#Farrokh%20Jal%20Vajifdar

Aḥmad Tafażżolī, "FRĀXKARD" (Vourukaša), Encyclopedia Iranica, 2013, Vol. X, Fasc. 2, p. 201, available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/2330-4804_EIRO_COM_1742

Maneckji Nusservanji Dhala, High Prist of the Parsis, "History of Zoroastrianism", Oxford University Press, 1938, 606, Avesta.org publishing, available at: https://www.avesta.org/dhalla/dhalla1.htm

Mansur Saki, "DEŽĪ NEBEŠT", Encyclopedia Iranica, 2013, Vol. VII, Fasc. 4, pp. 348-350, available at: https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/dez-i-nebest/


Figures:

Fig1. 3rd-century Mithraic depiction of Zoroaster found in Dura Europos, Syria, available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroaster#/media/File:CIMRM_44-Mithraic_pater_(Dura_Europos)_B.jpg

Fig 2.,  Mt Sabalan, Ardabil county, Azerbaijan, Iran, available at: https://www.irantourtravel.com/2017/12/the-dove-white-sabalan-mountain-soared.html

Fig 3. Map of the sacred lands created by Ahura Mazda for His people as described in Vendidat (Fargard 1), available at: https://www.academia.edu/164896035/Indo_Iranian_Roots_in_South_Caucasus

Fig 4. Zoroastrians pray in Ateshgah, Baku, Azerbaijan, available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism_in_Azerbaijan

Fig 5. “ATESHGAH TEMPLE” STATE HISTORICAL-ARCHITECTURAL RESERVE", Surakhani, Baku, Azerbaijan available at: https://ateshgahtemple.az/en/

IRS-HERITAGE: ZOROASTRIAN LEGENDS OF THE BAKU MAIDEN TOWER

 by Mahir Khalifa-zadeh*

Baku's Maiden Tower, view from the Sea, photo, 19th century, Baku, Azerbaijan

Posted from:

Khalifa-zadeh M, Khalifazadeh L, Zoroastrian Legends of the Baku Maiden Tower, IRS-HERITAGE, 2023, N 55, 33-39, available at: https://irs-az.com/en/journal/no-55-2023/457

Abstract:

The article focuses on the historical heritage of Azerbaijan’s capital, Baku, discussing cultural sediments related to the Baku Maiden Tower.  The tower is Baku’s architectural and historical landmark, deeply rooted in the ancient history of Azerbaijan, but its design, purpose, and date of construction remain unknown. The Maiden Tower is a source of legends and epics that enrich Azerbaijan’s cultural heritage and identity. The authors refer to legends rooted in the history of Zoroastrians in Azerbaijan, a land of fire. The legends, as the authors believe, mirror the Zoroastrian origin of the tower; however, an academic explanation remains a mystery to this day.  

* Khalifa-zadeh M., Research Professor, Ph.D, Canadian Historical Association, Ottawa, Canada

Download PDF:

https://irs-az.com/sites/default/files/2023-09/Heritage_55_2023%20%28small%29%20copy%204.pdf



Sasanian Ideology update: From Anahita fire in Fars to Adur Gushnasp fire temple in Azerbaijan

by Mahir Khalifa-zadeh

March 03, 2025

Posted from:

Khalifa-zadeh M., "Sasanian Imperial Ideology: From Anāhītā Fire in Pārs to Ādur Gušnasp Fire Temple in Ādurbādagān," International Journal of History, 2025, Vol 7, Issue 1, pp 23-28, DOI: 10.22271/27069109.2025.v7.i1a.344

PDF available at: https://www.historyjournal.net/article/344/7-1-5-963.pdf      or

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388360126_Sasanian_Imperial_Ideology_From_Anahita_Fire_In_Pars_To_Adur_Gusnasp_Fire_Temple_In_Adurbadagan

Ruins of the Sassanids' "cathedral" fire-temple of Ādur Gušnasp (Fire of Warrior Kings),
now Azar Goshnasp in Takht-e Sulaiman, Azerbaijan, Iran
 

Abstract: The article analyzes some developments in the ideology of the early Sassanids. The author briefly overviews Ardaxšīr I’s rise to power, highlighting his political ambitions that formed the basis for Sasanian imperial policy and ideology. The Sasanians came to power with political ambitions to restore the Truth and Persian Glory and eliminate the remnants of Hellenism that survived the Parthian period. The author discusses political and ideological reasons that motivated the early Sasanians to declare the fire temple of Ādur Gušnasp in Ādurbādagān as the empire’s most sacred fire. This step and Shāpūr I’s official declaration of Zoroastrianism as the state religion transformed Azerbaijan (Pahlavi: Ādurbādagān) into the empire’s most sacrosanct land, increasing the province’s imperial and strategic value as the center of ideology and propaganda. Finally, it is shown that granting the “cathedral” rank to the Ādur Gušnasp fire temple and attaching themselves to this officially proclaimed the empire’s most sacred victorious warriors’ class fire of the highest grade was a significant shift in the first Sassanids’ imperial ideology.

Keywords: Sasanian ideology, Zoroastrianism, Iran, Adurbadagan, Azerbaijan

Introduction

The Sasanian period was a significant part of Iran’s history. Some scholars consider the rise of the Sasanians as the result of a coup d’état by the Medes and Persians against the Parthian Arsacids. Others have claimed that the Sasanian period was characterized by a Sasanian Parthian confederacy [1]. 

Nevertheless, regardless of their Parthian roots, the Sasanians declared their political mission to restore the Truth and Persian Glory [2]. Intriguingly, rather than the fire temple of Anāhītā in Pārs, from where they rose to power, the first Sassanids proclaimed the holy shrine of Ādur Gušnasp in Ādurbādagān to be the empire’s most sacred fire, attaching themselves to this victorious warriors’ class fire of the highest grade [3]. The early Sasanians granted the rank of “cathedral” to Ādur Gušnasp fire of Media, which was the last surviving fire of the Great Fires of State that had been established sometime in the Parthian period [4]. 

Sasanian imperial ideology [5] had numerous changes during the reign of the Sassanid Persians [6] , which has incited significant interest in the political, religious, and ideological reasons behind these political and ideological shifts, particularly the proclamation of Ādur Gušnasp fire in Azerbaijan as the empire’s most sacred fire. Indeed, the early Sasanians’ proclamation of Zoroastrianism as the state religion and Ādur Gušnasp as the empire’s “cathedral” rank fire temple exemplifies the developments in Sasanian imperial ideology and strategy, which followed the transformation of Azerbaijan into the religious and ideological “core” of the empire and the center of official Zoroastrian propaganda. This significant move had administrative and military consequences that were addressed in the multi-targeted reforms of Kawād I (488-531) and Xusrō I Anōšīrvān (531-579)[7].

House of Sāsān rise to power: brief overview

The House of Sāsān rose in Iran in the late Parthian period following the internal struggle for power between the different branches of the House of Arsacids. There is evidence that a certain Sāsān, possibly a Parthian soldier or someone of Indo-Parthian origin, worked or was stationed in the house of Pābaq, who was the ruler of Istakhr in Persis/Pārs/Fārs. Some scholars indicate that Sāsān may have been a custodian of the great fire temple of Anāhītā where Pābaq was a priest.

The epic treatment in Firdowsi’s masterpiece Šāhnāme, which was based on the Sasanian chronicle “Xwadāynamāg”, states that Pābaq’s daughter (or Pābaq’s wife as he had a vision of his wife giving birth to a great king) [8] was married to Sāsān, and the princess gave birth to Ardaxšīr I [9]. 

Indeed, the rise of the House of Sāsān and the origin of Ardaxšīr I remains mysterious; however, most scholars follow Tabari’s account in the Šāhnāme that Pābaq’s daughter married Sāsān and gave birth to Ardaxšīr [10] . When Ardaxšīr came to power, he proclaimed his official genealogy to be “ardaxšīr ī kay ī pābagān ī az tōhmag ī sāsān nāf ī dārā šāh”, “Ardaxšīr the Kayānid, the son of Pābag, from the race of Sāsān, from the family of King Dārāy.” However, Darayee interprets this as: “The Kayānid dynasty in the Avesta, the mysterious protective deity Sāsān, and the connection to Dārāy (probably the conflation of the Achaemenids, Darius I and Darius II, and the Persis kings, Dārāyān I and Dārāyān II) all suggest a falsification of his lineage [11].” 

Nevertheless, Ardaxšīr I officially proclaimed himself a king of Persian origin and a descendant of the great Achaemenids [12]. However, the hostilities and internal struggles for power between the great Parsiq (Persian) and Pahlav (Parthian) families (Houses) continued until the Muslim conquest of Iran [13]. 

In 224 CE, on the same day of the decisive battle on the plain of Hormizdagān (somewhere in Media), slaying the Parthian king Ardawān IV, Ardaxšīr proclaimed himself šāhanšāh. Later, Ardaxšīr I had himself officially coronated in the captured Parthian imperial capital Ctesiphon and established the Sasanian empire [14].

Imperial religion, ideology, and Ādurbādagān [Azerbaijan]

One can interpret that Ardaxšīr I’s official genealogy and the stone reliefs at Naqsh-e Rostam give information about his official origin and the political essence of his power: the reinforcement of Zoroastrianism and the restoration of the Glory of Persians and Persian rule in the previous lands of the Achaemenids. Ardaxšīr’s official genealogy claims he was from the family of King Dārāy and supports the belief that he was the descendant of the Achaemenids and that his political ambitions to follow and protect Persian Glory [15]. 

The relief at Naqsh-e Rostam shows Ardaxšīr I receiving the ring (seal) of kingship as šāhanšāh of Ērānšahr from Ahura Mazdā propagates the divine blessing (xwarrah) to his kingship and indicates his duty to follow and enforce Zoroastrianism. The propaganda and ideology in the Kārnāmag ī Ardašīr ī Pāpagān (Book of the Deeds of Ardeshir, Son of Papak) also support and proclaim the legitimacy of Sasanian rule and ambitions [16]. Indeed, Ardaxšīr I and his son Shāpūr I had political ambitions to restore Persia to imperial glory by creating a centralized Sasanian empire in a Zoroastrian oecumene [17] and the institutionalization of Zoroastrianism as the sole religion of the state [18]. The rock-carvings at Naqsh-e Rostam show Ardaxšīr I giving the ring or seal of rule to his son Shāpūr I, which could be interpreted as meaning that his son was mandated to follow his father’s policy and ideology and enforce Ardaxšīr I’s legacy. Truly, like his father, Shāpūr I expressed his devotion to fire as an icon of the religion and officially proclaimed Zoroastrianism the state religion [19]. 

Therefore, from these images, one may assume that Sasanian imperialism [20] was the backbone of Shāpūr I’s imperial policy, which was ideologically based on Zoroastrianism as the sole imperial religion and Achaemenid Persian Glory. Consequently, official state propaganda distanced the Sassanid Persians from the Parthians and associated them with the Achaemenid Persians [21]. 

In fact, Shāpūr I was focused on enforcing a centralized Sasanian state in a Zoroastrian oecumene and eliminating the last signs of Hellenism that had survived the Parthian period. He used Sasanian imperialism to strengthen the central power and Zoroastrianism in lands surrounding Ērānšahr. Shāpūr I established many Bahrām fires for his soul (Xusraw Šāhbūhr), his daughter (Xusraw ĀdurAnāhīd), and many others. He also established sacred fires and supported communities of priests in Syria, Cilicia, Cappadocia, and Armin (Armenia or Arminiyaya) [22]. 

Politically and ideologically, the establishment of the sacred fires network was aimed to strengthen the power of the šāhanšāh and symbolized the unification of the state, the authority of the hierarchy of priests, and the ubiquitous nature of Zoroastrian religion. The early Sasanians categorized the fire temples, particularly the three Great Fires of State, one of which, the fire of Ādur Gušnasp in Ādurbādagān, was declared the victorious warriors’ (artēštār) class fire of the highest grade [23].

Interestingly, in the Seleucid and Parthian eras, the province of Ādurbādagān (Parthian or Arsacid Pahlavi: Āturpātākān) was one of the strongholds against the spread of the Greek and Roman pantheon in Iran. It is also highly likely that Āturpātākān was the place where the prophet Zarathustra was born [24, 25], and where the Holy Avesta was kept in the holy shrine of the Ātur (Old Persian) or Ādur Gušnasp fire temple in Šiz (now Takht-e Sulaiman, Azerbaijan) [26, 27].

Ādur Gušnasp, an Ataš Bahrām (Parthian: Ātaš-i- Wahram or Pahlavi: Ādur Bahrām -“fires of Victory,” was the Zoroastrian name for the God of War and Victory), was the most sacred and “cathedral” fire of the highest grade in Zoroastrianism, which had been established in the late Achaemenid or Parthian era in Ādurbādagān in Media [28]. Each new king, as Shāpūr I proclaimed, was obligated to make a pilgrimage after their coronation to Ādur Gušnasp, provide royal gifts, and celebrate Nowruz (No Ruz).

Intriguingly, despite the Sassanids proclaimed their Achaemenid Persian origin, they followed the Arsacid Parthians’ tradition of donations, which at the time were donated to the Ādur Burzēn-Mihr fire. This was the second fire the Sasanians categorized as one of the Great Fires of State. The fire was established sometime in the 5th or 4th century BC in Parthia (the northeast of Iran), but at the time of the Sassanids, it had been occupied and destroyed [29]. Ideologically, the proclamation of the Ādur Gušnasp fire of Media as the victorious warriors’ class fire of the highest grade, to which the Sasanians officially attached themselves, demonstrated Persia’s superiority over Media and Parthia [30]. 

Next, aiming to secure themselves as the ruling dynasty, the early Sasanian strategy was focused on putting the politically powerful and religiously and ideologically influential Zoroastrian clergy or Magi/Magus (maguš) under the šāhanšāh’s control. Some scholars believe the Maguses, who played a cathedral role at the time [31], were a class of priests and/or a tribe from Media. [32, 33], Diakonoff argued that the Maguses supplied the Medes with court priests as early as under the last Median king Astyages [34]. Therefore, as followers of Achaemenid Persians, the early Sasanians attempted to control the Maguses of Median and/or Persian origin because they considered it a high-priority political and ideological task to secure Persian power over Media and the Medes [35]. It is also possible that the Sasanians knew of Gaumāta’s or the Maguses’/Medes’ revolt [36]. 

In this regard, Ardaxšīr I’s and his son Shāpūr I’s attempts to control the Zoroastrian clergy were a key element in their imperial strategy that was promoted by Kirdēr the herbed (priestly teacher), who was the famous and powerful religious leader of the time. They gave him a position close to the šāhanšāh’s court, ordering him to categorize the Great Fires and ceremonial protocols. Shāpūr I granted Kirdēr the title of mobedān mobed (priest of priests). Kirdēr was affiliated with the fire temple of Ādur Gušnasp in Azerbaijan and had another name Kirdēr-Gušnasp [37]. The other highly influential and powerful mobedān mobed during Sasanian King Šāpūr II’s rein was Ādurbād-ī Mahrspandān (“Ādurbād, son of Mahraspand”), who was also affiliated with Ādur Gušnasp [38]. 

Politically, by ensuring the Zoroastrian priests were close to the court, the early Sasanians demonstrated the unity of State and Church, which were interconnected and mutually dependent. Ardaxšīr I’s chief priest Kirdēr stated that the “Church and State were born of one womb [39].” The early Sasanians needed Zoroastrian priests to act as their counselors in religious affairs to support the dynasty’s claim to legitimacy [40, 41]. Shāpūr I authorized Kirdēr, who was a Zoroastrian fanatic, to eliminate Mithraism along the Medes and Maguses of Media and to strengthen Zoroastrianism in the lands challenged by Christian Byzantium, allowing him to establish the fire temples around the empire and in Syria and Armenia. 

Next, one can interpret that the Sassanid Persians’ proclamation of Ādur Gušnasp as the empire’s most sacred and “cathedral” fire was a step to be politically and ideologically distanced (as proclaimed Achaemenid Persian descendants) from the Achaeimends’ favored but ruined by the Macedonians the fire-temple of Anāhītā [42], even though this temple played a key ideological role in the Sassanids’ rise to power as Goddess Anāhītā blessed restorators of the Truth and Achaemenid Persian Glory. It should not be excluded that the early Sasanians needed to prove that they were the rightful restorers of the Truth (which “must needs be restored by a man of true and upright judgment”) and the Glory of Persians over the Medians and Parthians [43]. 

Furthermore, as the proclaimed descendants of Achaemenid Persians, the early Sassanids may have been ideologically obligated to demonstrate an anti-Hellenistic reaction [44], to separate themselves from the Arsacid Parthians, which they claimed were “unworthy interlopers [45] ” affected by Greek traditions. Therefore, by granting “cathedral” rank to the last surviving Great Fire of State of Ādur Gušnasp in Ādurbādagān, which the Macedonians had never damaged, and attaching themselves to this victorious warriors’ class fire of the highest grade, the early Sassanids chose to distance themselves from Alexander ransacked the Anāhītā fire in Fārs demonstrating a strong anti-Hellenistic reaction. This step indicated the further development or adjustment of the early Sasanian ideology as follows:

- from the Sassanids’ origin as the restorers of Truth and Achaemenid Persians’ Glory;

- to the fighters or protectors of Truth and Persian Glory, as Sasanian victorious (pērōzgar) warriors (artēštār).

Furthermore, the proclamation of Ādur Gušnasp fire, the most sacred imperial sanctuary had other additional political and ideological grounds. 

Indeed, the fire temple of Anāhītā had been sacked by Alexander of Macedon, who had burnt there the 12,000 oxhides on which the original Avesta was written in golden lettering and which had been placed in the Fortress of Archives in the city of Istakhr in Pārs [46]. However, another copy of the Holy Avesta [47], copied on calf skins was kept in the fire temple of Ādur Gušnasp in Azerbaijan [48, 49]. In this regard, it should be noted that King Darius III’s General Aturpāt (Atropates), the satrap of Media, had been able to secure the holy fire in Ādur Gušnasp. In 324 BC, Aturpāt pacified the unrest against the Greeks and Alexander decided to keep him as king of the land, which later became the independent (or semi-independent, vassal of Arsacid Parthia) kingdom of Atropatena (Greek) or Āturpātākān (Parthian or Arsakid Pahlavi). Atropates’ daughter was married to Perdiccas, Alexander’s close ally and a commander of the Macedonian cavalry [50]. 

Thus, ideologically, it is safe to assume that Shāpūr I’s decision to declare Ādur Gušnasp, the sole survivor of the three Great Fires of State, as the empire’s most sacred firetemple had the logic of the so-called “ideological clean up” of the Macedonians’ destruction of the Anāhītā fire temple and burning there of the Holy Avesta symbolizing Shāpūr I's full departure (political and ideological) from the vestiges of Hellenism surviving from the Parthian period and marked a policy of remedying the great impact that the Greeks had had on the country as the destroyers of the Achaemenids to whom the Sassanid Persians attached their genealogy. 

Further, politically, selecting Ādur Gušnasp as the cathedral fire temple allowed Shāpūr I to secure direct control over the powerful Zoroastrian priests or Maguses affiliated with this temple. It also allowed him to keep the religious clergy within official Sasanian policy, eliminating any avenue for anti-dynastic propaganda or even a revolt by the Medes or Maguses. 

As the early Sassanids officially declared their mission to be the restorers of Truth and Persian Glory, by linking their genealogy to the Achaemenid Persians, it could be assumed that they selected the “pure clean” fire temple as the most sacred fire of the Sassanid Persians’ empire because it had never been ruined or humiliated by Alexander of Macedon. Consequently, the Sassanians attached themselves to Ādurbādagān’s Ādur Gušnasp fire, where the Holy Avesta was preserved and proclaimed it to be the empire’s most sacred fire. By categorizing Ādur Gušnasp as the “cathedral” fire temple, the early Sasanians transformed Azerbaijan into the empire’s religious and ideological centre, with military and administrative consequences ensuing [51]. 

There is no doubt that the fire temple of Anāhītā in Pārs, from where the Sassanids rose to power, was the heart of the Sasanian dynasty, who declared themselves the guardians of the temple [52]. The value of the fire for the Sasanians was demonstrated in the spring of 632 CE when Yazdgerd III was crowned at the Anāhītā fire temple in Istakhr, where he had been hiding during Iran’s civil war [53]. 

However, the declared political and ideological ambitions of the early Sasamians reasonably dictated them to distance from the Anāhītā fire temple, humiliated by Alexander the Great by the burning of the Holy Avesta, following the proclamation Ādur Gušnasp of Media as the “cathedral” and the most sacred fire of the empire [54]. 

Furthermore, the attachment of the Sasanians to Ādurbādagān’s Ādur Gušnasp fire sent a strong political message to those inside the empire and to their neighbors, particularly the Roman/Byzantium Empire. Starting from Julius Caesar, the Roman and later Byzantine emperors’ ambitions were compared to those of Alexander the Great in the East. They propagated themselves as the successors of Alexander and were full of ambitions to re-conquer and defeat Persia [55]. In this light, the early Sassanids’ distancing from Alexander’s ransacked fire of Anāhītā had an additional political and ideological essence, particularly messaging to the Romans that the Sassanids were ready to fight for Persia and Persian Glory as the victorious warriors of the Ādur Gušnasp fire temple. 

Next, it is necessary to stress that the Sassanids’ key geopolitical and religious rival Byzantium acknowledged the imperial, military, and ideological value of and Ādurbādagān as the Sasanian empire’s most religiously sacrosanct land holding the empre’s most sacred fire of Ādur Gušnasp. In 623, the Byzantine emperor Heraclius, during the last Byzantine-Sassanian war of 602-628 CE, occupied Azerbaijan and sacked Ādur Gušnasp intending to crush the Sassanids’ will and power to fight. As Greenwood mentioned, Heraclius had recognised the potential for striking at the central Ādurbādagān province of the Sasanian empire from the north, using Armenia as a bridgehead [56] . Some scholars have argued, that because Emperor Heraclius’ letters before the war and the Byzantines’ return to Jerusalem of the Holy Cross, which had been captured by the Sasanians in 614 and stored in Ādurbādagān’s capital Ganzak [57], this war was religious revenge [58]. Heraclius ruined the great and most sacred fire temple of the Sasanians, extinguishing the fire in Ādur Gušnasp and polluting the lake's water in the fire complex with corpses [59]. 

Later, in 651, the Muslim Arabs sought to paralyze the Sasanians by focusing their final attack on Azerbaijan where Yazdgerd III was attempting to establish his new army. 

Finally, the early Sassanids’ proclamation of Ādur Gušnasp as the empire’s most sacred fire temple with the rank of “cathedral” and the institutionalization of Zoroastrianism as the state religion reveal the evolutionary developments in early Sasanian imperial policy and ideology. These developments transformed Azerbaijan into the religious and ideological “core” of the Sasanian Empire. As Hakimfar rightly highlighted, when the Magi were converted to Zoroastrianism under the empire’s chief priest KirdērGušnasp of Ādur Gušnasp, Azerbaijan became the ideological centre for the propagation of the Zoroastrian religion [60].

Conclusion

Official Sasanian propaganda presented the Sasanians as the restorers of Truth and Persian Glory and rulers of the lands that previously belonged to the Achaemenian dynasty. The Sasanians portrayed themselves as successors to the Achaemenid Persians. The early Sasanians strove to eliminate the Parthian era remnants of Hellenism and institutionalize Zoroastrianism as the only religion of Ērānšahr. King Shāpūr I declared Zoroastrianism to be the imperial religion and proclaimed the last surviving Great Fire of State, Ādur Gušnasp in Azerbaijan, to be the empire’s most sacred fire. Shāpūr I further attached the Sasanians to Ādur Gušnasp victorious warriors’ class fire of the highest grade and granted it the rank of “cathedral”. In this light, it can be assumed that the early Sassanids’ attachment to the Ādur Gušnasp fire indicates a further development in their imperial ideology and policy that moved from the restorers of Truth and Achaemenid Persian Glory to the protectors or fighters for Truth and Persian Glory. 

It is also rational to believe that the political and ideological distancing of the early Sassanids from the Anāhītā fire, from which they rose to power but was ransacked and humiliated by Alexander of Macedon’s burning of the Holy Avesta, was needed to prove their full and absolute departure from the impacts of the Greek world. 

Ideologically, attaching themselves to the Ādur Gušnasp, the early Sasanians presented themselves to Ērān and Anērān (non-Iran) as great warriors. 

Politically, it could also be considered as the strong message to Rome/Byzantium, which claimed ownership of Alexander the Great’s heritage that the Sassanid Persians were legitimate descendants of the Achaemenid Persians and protectors or “victorious warriors” of the great Achaemenid Persian heritage. 

In the meantime, by keeping the Achaemenid's favored Anāhitā fire in their hearts and guarding it, the early Sassanids, nevertheless, obligated every new šāhanšāh after the official coronation to make a pilgrimage and donate royal gifts to the Ādur Gušnasp fire to signify its highest rank. 

Further, the Sasanians reacted to internal political demands by granting Ādur Gušnasp the honor of being the empire’s “cathedral” rank fire. This acknowledgment established direct political control through the mobedān mobed (priest of priests) over the powerful, rich, and influential Zoroastrian priesthood of Persian and Medes origin. The highest priests, Kirdēr-Gušnasp and Ādurbād-ī Mahraspānd, who were both affiliated with Ādur Gušnasp, were close to the crown and advised the šāhanšāhs. 

Therefore, by declaring Ādur Gušnasp to be the empire’s most sacred and “cathedral” fire, the early Sasanians transformed Ādurbādagān into the religious “core” of the state and the ideological centre of imperial Zoroastrian propaganda. 

Notably, Azerbaijan was a province controlled by the great Pahlav House of Ispahbudhan, which had close relations with the other powerful great Pahlav House of Mehrān, the shāh’s dynasty in Arrān (Albania). Both families were influential in Sasanian internal politics, as recalling that šāhanšāh Xusrō I’s mother was a Ispahbudhan noblewoman and the Sasanian military elite were mostly from either the Ispahbudhan or Mehrān Houses. Therefore, in an attempt to reduce the great feudal lords’ power in the empire’s internal politics, a high priority of the House of Sāsān was to keep “an eye” on the Ādurbādagān and Arrān noble (šahrdārān) families’ politics. By controlling the nobles’ activities, the House of Sāsān focused on preventing any possible revolt or coup d'etat by the Pahlav Houses, however, general Bahrām Chōbīn of Mehrān did briefly become šāhanšāh Bahrām VI, claiming that the Sasanians were usurpers. 

Thus, the transformation of Azerbaijan into the religious centre of the empire was beneficial to the Sassanids’ ideology, military, administrative, and internal politics. However, Azerbaijan's proximity to the empire’s war zones meant the province was vulnerable, a fact that both the Sasanians and their enemies were aware of.

References:

1. Pourshariati P. Decline and fall of the Sasanian Empire: The Sasanian-Parthian Confederacy and the Arab Conquest of Iran. I.B. Tauris; 2008. p. 552

2. Olbrycht M. Dynastic connections in the Arsacid Empire and the origin of the House of Sāsān. In: Sarkosh C, Pendleton E, Alram M, Daryaee T, editors. The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires: Adaptation and Expansion. Oxbow Books; 2016. p. 160. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dkb6

3. Potts D, Canepa M. Fires of Iran, great. In: Nicholson O, editor. The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 1744.

4. Farridnejad Sh. Zaraθuštrōtəma, Zoroastrian and Iranian Studies in Honour of Philip G. Kreyenbroek. London: Brill; 2021. p. 332.

5. Emrani H. Like father, like daughter: Late Sasanian imperial ideology and the rise of Bōrān to power. Int J Anc Iran Stud. 2007;8:13-14.

6. Shayegan R. Sasanian political ideology. In: Potts DT, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran. Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 805-813.

7. Khalifa-zadeh M. Sasanian imperial strategy and King Xusrō I Anōšīrvān's reform: The case of Ādurbādagān and Arrān (Caucasian Albania). Int J Hist. 2024;6(1):111-121. DOI: 10.22271/27069109.2024.v6.i1b.271

8. Agathias. The Histories. Frendo JD, translator. Berlin: De Gryter; 1975. p. 163.

9. Frye R. The political history of Iran under the Sasanians. In: Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge University Press; 1983. 3(1):74.

10. Bosworth C. The History of Al-Tabari: The Sasanids, the Byzantines, the Lakhmids, and Yemen. State University of New York Press; 1990. p. 458.

11. Darayee T. Ardaxšīr and the Sasanians’ rise to power. Anabasis, Stud Class Orient. 2010;1:236-255.

12. Shayegan R. The Arsacids and Commagene. In: Sarkhosh V, et al., editors. The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires. Philadelphia: Oxbow; 2016. p. 8-22.

13. Domiziana R. Sasanian kings as decision-makers: Reshaping Ērānshahr. In: Furlan U, Husoy TA, Bohun H, editors. Narratives of Power in the Ancient World. Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2022. p. 252-270.

14. Maksymiuk M. Armenia in political and military activities of Ardaxšīr I. Persica Antiqua. 2021;1:87-96. DOI: 10.22034/pa.2021.133726

15. Darayee T., 2010.

16. Kreyenbroek PG. Zoroastrianism under the Sasanians. In: Rezania K, editor. Teachers and Teachings in the Good Religion: Opera Minora on Zoroastrianism. Harrassowitz Verlag; 2013. p. 259.

17. Darayee T. Sasanian Persia: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. I.B. Taurus; 2009. p. 248.

18. Shayegan R. Arsacids and Sasanians: Political Ideology in Post-Hellenistic and Late Antique Persia. Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 539.

19. Fowlkes-Childs B. The Sasanian Empire (224-651 A.D.). In: Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art; 2016. Available at: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/sass/hd_sass.htm

20. Shayegan R. The end of the Parthian Arsacid Empire. In: Gehler M, Rollinger R, Strobl P, editors. The End of Empires. Springer; 2022. p. 761.

21. Olbrycht M. Dynastic connections in the Arsacid Empire and the origins of the House of Sāsān. In: Curtis VS, Pendleton E, Daryaee T, Alram M, editors. The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires: Adaptation and Expansion. Oxbow Books; 2016. 5:23-35.

22. Kreyenbroek PG., 2013

23. Potts D, Canepa M. Fires of Iran, great. In: Nicholson O, editor. The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 1744.

24. Gnoli G. Zoroaster's Time and Homeland: A Study on the Origins of Mazdeism and Related Problems. Istituto Universitario Orientale, Avesta; 1980. p. 279.

25. Bosworth C. AZERBAIJAN IV. Encyclopedia Iranica. 2011;III(2-3):224-231. Available at: www.iranicaonline.org 

26. Ghodrat-Dizaji M. Administrative geography of the early Sasanian period: Case of Ādurbādagān. Iran: J Br Inst Persian Stud. 2007;45:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2007.11864720

27. Khalifa-zadeh M., 2024

28. Boyce M. ĀDUR GUŠNASP. Encyclopedia Iranica. 2014;I(5):475-476. Available at: www.iranicaonline.org 

29. Yamamoto Y. The Zoroastrian temple cult of fire in archaeology and literature. Part II. Orient. 1981;17:67- 104. DOI.org/10.5356/orient1960.17.67

30. Kreyenbroek PG., 2013

31. Qaderi Z. Maguses, their religion and ethnicity (Median or Persian, Zoroaster or Anti-Zoroaster)? 2012. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3912158 or http://dx.DOI.org/10.2139/ssrn.3912158

32. Dandamayev M. MAGI. Encyclopedia Iranica. 2000 Jan 1. Available at: www.iranicaonline.org 

33. Gamsakhurdia K. Fire priests and magi in Iberia. Tbilisi State University, SPEKALI. 2020;4. Available at: https://www.spekali.tsu.ge/index.php/en/article/viewArticle/14/230

34. Diakonoff I. Istoriya Midii ot drevneĭshikh vremen do kontsa 4 v. do n.e. Moscow & Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR; 1956. p. 453.

35. Qaderi Z. Maguses, their religion and ethnicity (Median or Persian, Zoroaster or Anti-Zoroaster)? 2012. 

36. Shayegan R. Bardia and Gaumāta: An Achamenid enigma reconsidered. Bull Asia Inst. 2006;20:65-76.

37. Skjærvø O. KARTIR. Encyclopedia Iranica. XV/6:608- 628. 2012 Dec 30. Available at: www.iranicaonline.org 

38. Tafazzolī A. ĀDURBĀD Ī MAHRSPANDĀN. Encyclopedia Iranica. I/5:477. 2014 Mar 6. Available at: www.iranicaonline.org 

39. Choksky J. Sacral kingship in Sasanian Iran. The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies (CAIS). Available at:  https://www.caissoas.com/CAIS/History/Sasanian/sacral_kingship.htm

40. Howard-Johnston J. The Late Sasanian army. In: Bernheimer T, Silverstein A, editors. Late Antiquity: Eastern Perspectives. Warminster: The Gibb Memorial Trust; c2012. p. 87-127.

41. Boyce M. On the sacred fires of the Zoroastrians. Bull Sch Orient Afr Stud Univ Lond. 1968;31(1):52-68.

42. Shavarebi E. The temples of Anahid at Estakhr (Southern Iran): Historical documents and archaeological evidence. In: Belaj J, et al., editors. Sacralization of Landscape and Sacred Places: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference of Mediaeval Archaeology of the Institute of Archaeology, Zagreb, 2-3 June 2016. Zbornik Instituta za Arheologiju. 2018;10:179-195.

43. Kreyenbroek PG., 2013

44. Toumanoff C. Introduction to Christian Caucasian history: The formative centuries (IVth-VIIIth). Traditio. 1959;15:1-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362152900008217

45. Overtoom N. The rivalry of Rome and Parthia in the sources from the Augustan age to late antiquity. Anabasis Stud Class Orient. 2016;7:137-174.

46. Kotwal F, Kreyenbroek PG. ALEXANDER THE GREAT II. In: Zoroastrian tradition. Encyclopedia Iranica. 2011 Jul 29. Available at: www.iranicaonline.org

47. Kreyenbroek PG., 2013

48. Ghodrat-Dizaji M. Administrative geography of the early Sasanian period: Case of Ādurbādagān. Iran: J Br Inst Persian Stud. 2007;45:87-93.

49. Gamsakhurdia K. Fire priests and magi in Iberia. Tbilisi State University, SPEKALI. c2020;4. Available at: https://www.spekali.tsu.ge/index.php/en/article/viewArt icle/14/230

50. Chaumont M. ATROPATES. Encyclopedia Iranica. III/1:17-18. 2011 Aug 17. Available at: www.iranicaonline.org 

51. Khalifa-zadeh M, Maksymuik K. Reforms of Sasanian King Khusro I and the northern bank of the Araxes - Arrān (Caucasus Albania). Historia i Świat. 2023;12:167-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34739/his.2023.12.10

52. Kreyenbroek PG., 2013

53. Frye R. The period from the Arab invasion to the Saljuqs. Cambridge History of Iran. 2008;4:711.

54. Kreyenbroek PG., 2013

55. Overtoom N. The rivalry of Rome and Parthia in the sources from the Augustan age to late antiquity. Anabasis Stud Class Orient. 2016;7:137-172.

56. Greenwood T. Armenian neighbours (600-1045). In: Shepard J, editor. The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire c.500-1492. Cambridge University Press; c2009. p. 333-364.

57. Greenwood T. Armenian neighbours (600-1045). The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire. 2009;8:333-364.

58. Maksymiuk K. Destruction of the Ādur Gušnasp temple in Ādurbādagān as a revenge for abduction of the Holy Cross from Jerusalem in the context of the letters of Heraclius. Matamorfozii Istorii. 2017;9:109-125.

59. Howard-Johnston J. Heraclius’ Persian campaigns and the revival of the East Roman Empire, 622-630. War Hist. 1999;6(1):1-44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26014109

60. Hakimifar Kh. Magi and their influence on the Zoroastrian religion. J Comp Theol. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/40497661/Magi_and_their_Influence_on_the_Zoroastrian_Religion

How to cite this article:

Khalifa-zadeh Mahir. Sasanian Imperial Ideology: From Anāhītā Fire in Pārs to Ādur Gušnasp Fire Temple in Ādurbādagān. Int J Hist 2025;7(1):23-28. DOI: 10.22271/27069109.2025.v7.i1a.344